Corporate Social Responsibility and Creative Performance: The Indirect Effect of Creative Self-Efficacy, Spiritual Intelligence, and Organizational Identification

Authors

  • Omer Sagheer CASE Institute affiliated by Quaid-e-Azam University/ Islamabad
  • Muhammad Umer

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Ability Organizational Identification Creative Self-Efficacy; Employee-Manager Relationship; Spiritual Intelligence; MNCs; Pakistan

Abstract

Purpose: The relationship between CSR and improved attitudes and actions on the job is the subject of a growing corpus of study. Even while there is evidence that CSR boosts employee loyalty, motivation, contentment, and commitment, there is surprisingly little research on how CSR affects employees' ability to think creatively.

 Design and Methodology: The sample data were collected from Six Pakistani MNCs involved in CSR practices in the capital cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad. These companies include Jazz, Telenor, Careem, Schlumberger, Berger Paints Pakistan, and McDonald's Pakistan. Only these six were chosen because they are the top-ranked organizations in Pakistan. The self-employed questionnaire was rotated via Google Forms. Out of 60 responses, 52 were considered for the present study. The repeated items, some questions left unchecked were excluded from the study.

 Findings: The results have shown that the Employee-managers who place a high priority on CSR campaigns and other practices are seen in the research to have positive effects on the firm, including increased employee dedication, loyalty, and innovation. Also, it was found that organizational identity mediates between creative self-efficacy and Spiritual Intelligence and has a positive effect on organizations’ performance.

 Implications: The findings provided useful insight for policymakers in MNCs organizations for planning and execution by incorporating CSR practices for the positive outcome and to maintain a positive environment in the organization for optimization of output.

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility; Corporate Ability; Organizational Identification; Creative Self-Efficacy; Employee-Manager Relationship; Spiritual Intelligence; MNCs; Pakistan.

References

Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180403

Alsanius, B. W., Jirström, M., Naznin, M. T., Khalil, S., & Ekström, E. (2020). undefined. Achieving sustainable urban agriculture, 223-280. https://doi.org/10.19103/as.2019.0063.15

Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367

Amram, Y., & Dryer, C. D. (2008). Integrated spiritual intelligence scale: Development and preliminary validation. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e507962008-001

Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 63-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.002

Benjamin, L., & Flynn, F. J. (2006). Leadership style and regulatory mode: Value from fit? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(2), 216-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.008

Berger, I. E. (2006). Identity, identification, and relationship through social alliances. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284973

Berry, C. (1994). One hundred percent perspiration. Creativity; beyond the myth of genius. Robert W. Weisberg. W.H. Freeman & Co, New York. No. of pages: 312. ISBN 0-7176-2365-4 (hardback) and 0-7167-2367-0 (paperback). Price £21.95 and £12.95, respectively. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8(6), 613-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080607

Brammer, S., He, H., & Mellahi, K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, employee organizational identification, and creative effort. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 323-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114562246

Cheney, G., & Tompkins, P. K. (1987). Coming to terms with organizational identification and commitment. Central States Speech Journal, 38(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978709368225

Conti, R., & April, B. (2020). An inspiration to study inspiration. Creativity at Work, 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61311-2_2

Cunningham, N. (2002). Green alliances: Conflict or cooperation in environmental policy? Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 9(3), 148-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2002.10648555

Davies, I. A., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in small-and medium-size enterprises: Investigating employee engagement in fair trade companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(2), 126-139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8608.2010.01586.x

Duberley, J. P., & Walley, P. (1995). Assessing the adoption of HRM by small and medium-sized manufacturing organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(4), 891-909. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585199500000052

Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-Mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618-630. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040653

Hammer, E. R. (1984). Research in organizational BehaviorResearch in organizational behaviour, (Vol. 5)by Cummings L. L. Staw Barry M.(Eds.). Greenwich, CONN.: JAI Press, 1983, 357 pp., $45 cloth. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 565-567. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4279727

Hassan, A., & Lund-Thomsen, P. (2019). undefined. Corporate Social Responsibility, 305-321. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6192-7.ch017

Hirst, G., Van Dick, R., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2007). Employee learning behaviour and creativity: A social identity approach. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e518532013-336

Houghton, J. D., & DiLiello, T. C. (2010). Leadership development: The key to unlocking individual creativity in organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(3), 230-245. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731011039343

Hunt, E. (1994). undefined. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8(5), 528-529. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080511

Javaid Lone, E., Ali, A., & Khan, I. (2016). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(5), 785-797. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-05-2016-0100

Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 857-878. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909x477495

Lee, K., Herold, D. M., & Yu, A. (2015). undefined. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(2), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1366

Ma, X. (n.d.). Examining the effects of individual Polychronicity and supervisor's management style on creative self-efficacy. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.16992352.v1

Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There's no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support employees' creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757-767. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069309

Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their Alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202

McWilliams, A., Rupp, D. E., Stahl, G. K., Siegel, D. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2019). undefined. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198802280.013.1

Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering the organizational identification questionnaire. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(4), 626-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318900134003

Mittal, S., & Dhar, R. L. (2015). Transformational leadership and employee creativity.

Nguyen Hong, T., & Pham Tran, P. (2021). Corporate social responsibility for employee retention and engagement in small and medium-sized enterprises: A case study in Vietnam. Journal of Trade Science, 49-59. https://doi.org/10.54404/jts.2021.9.04.05

O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behaviour. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492-499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492

Pérez, A. (2015). Corporate reputation and CSR reporting to stakeholders. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(1), 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-01-2014-0003

Rayman-Bacchus, L. (2017). undefined. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131547007

Rayman-Bacchus, L., & Walsh, P. R. (2021). Corporate responsibility and sustainable development. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315142524

Raza, J., & Majid, A. (2015). Perceptions and practices of corporate social responsibility among SMEs in Pakistan. Quality & Quantity, 50(6), 2625-2650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0281-2

Staples, D. S., Hulland, J. S., & Higgins, C. A. (2006). undefined. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4), 0-0. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00085.x

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. Political Psychology, 276-293. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16

Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2001). Identity and cooperative behaviour in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4(3), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430201004003003

Visser, W. (2009). undefined. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 473-500. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0021

Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1998). undefined. Handbook of Creativity, 189-212. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511807916.012

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Sagheer, O., & Muhammad Umer. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility and Creative Performance: The Indirect Effect of Creative Self-Efficacy, Spiritual Intelligence, and Organizational Identification. UW Journal of Management Sciences, 7(1), 70–88. Retrieved from https://uwjms.org.pk/index.php/uwjms/article/view/113